Ballangeich vs Maffra
Property investment comparison - Ballangeich, VIC 3279 vs Maffra, VIC 3860
Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Ballangeich wins 0, Maffra wins 2. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.
| Metric | Ballangeich | Maffra |
|---|---|---|
| Median house price | $505K | $500K |
| Median unit price | - | $360K |
| Gross rental yield (houses) | 4.70% | 4.98% |
| Gross rental yield (units) | - | - |
| 1-year house growth | - | +12.5% |
| 3-year house growth | - | +10.6% |
| Vacancy rate | - | 1.5% |
| Population | 71 | 5,384 |
Ballangeich vs Maffra: what the numbers say
The median house price is $505K in Ballangeich and $500K in Maffra, so Maffra is the cheaper entry point, with Ballangeich houses about 1% dearer.
On cash flow, Maffra leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 4.98%, compared with 4.70% in Ballangeich, a gap of 0.28 percentage points.
Maffra is the bigger suburb, with a population of 5,384 against 71, roughly 76 times the size of Ballangeich; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.
In short: Maffra for rental income, Maffra for a lower purchase price. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.
Keep exploring
- National investment guide - top suburbs across every metric
- Take the suburb finder quiz - 5 questions to match your goals
- How our investment score works
- Property investment glossary - every term defined
Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs
Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.
Open interactive comparison