Ballarat Central vs Gazette
Property investment comparison - Ballarat Central, VIC 3350 vs Gazette, VIC 3289
Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Ballarat Central wins 0, Gazette wins 2. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.
| Metric | Ballarat Central | Gazette |
|---|---|---|
| Median house price | $660K | $660K |
| Median unit price | $430K | - |
| Gross rental yield (houses) | 3.54% | 4.75% |
| Gross rental yield (units) | 4.63% | - |
| 1-year house growth | +9.7% | - |
| 3-year house growth | +8.1% | - |
| Vacancy rate | 1.1% | 1.1% |
| Population | 5,378 | 42 |
Ballarat Central vs Gazette: what the numbers say
Houses cost about the same in both suburbs: the median house price is $660K in Ballarat Central and $660K in Gazette.
On cash flow, Gazette leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 4.75%, compared with 3.54% in Ballarat Central, a gap of 1.21 percentage points.
Rental vacancy is the same in both, at 1.1%.
Ballarat Central is the bigger suburb, with a population of 5,378 against 42, roughly 128 times the size of Gazette; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.
In short: Gazette for rental income. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.
Full profile
Ballarat Central, VIC 3350
Open Ballarat Central suburb profileRecent sales in Ballarat Central
Keep exploring
- National investment guide - top suburbs across every metric
- Take the suburb finder quiz - 5 questions to match your goals
- How our investment score works
- Property investment glossary - every term defined
Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs
Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.
Open interactive comparison