Ballimore vs Warialda
Property investment comparison - Ballimore, NSW 2830 vs Warialda, NSW 2402
Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Ballimore wins 1, Warialda wins 2. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.
| Metric | Ballimore | Warialda |
|---|---|---|
| Median house price | $270K | $295K |
| Median unit price | $345K | $300K |
| Gross rental yield (houses) | - | 5.69% |
| Gross rental yield (units) | - | 5.89% |
| 1-year house growth | - | +10.8%estimate |
| 3-year house growth | - | - |
| Vacancy rate | 1.8% | 0.9% |
| Population | 240 | 1,480 |
Ballimore vs Warialda: what the numbers say
The median house price is $270K in Ballimore and $295K in Warialda, so Ballimore is the cheaper entry point, with Warialda houses about 9% dearer.
For units, Ballimore sits at a median of $345K against $300K in Warialda, which makes Warialda the more affordable unit market and Ballimore the pricier one.
Rental vacancy is 0.9% in Warialda and 1.8% in Ballimore, so landlords in Warialda face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.
Warialda is the bigger suburb, with a population of 1,480 against 240, roughly 6 times the size of Ballimore; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.
In short: Ballimore for a lower purchase price, Warialda for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.
Keep exploring
- National investment guide - top suburbs across every metric
- Take the suburb finder quiz - 5 questions to match your goals
- How our investment score works
- Property investment glossary - every term defined
Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs
Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.
Open interactive comparison