Skip to main content

Balnarring vs Essendon North

Property investment comparison - Balnarring, VIC 3926 vs Essendon North, VIC 3041

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Balnarring wins 1, Essendon North wins 3. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricBalnarringEssendon North
Median house price$1.4M$1.4M
Median unit price-$415K
Gross rental yield (houses)2.96%2.54%
Gross rental yield (units)3.32%6.37%
1-year house growth-3.6%estimate+13.7%
3-year house growth-+24.2%
Vacancy rate1.7%1.4%
Population2,3713,071

Balnarring vs Essendon North: what the numbers say

Houses cost about the same in both suburbs: the median house price is $1.4M in Balnarring and $1.4M in Essendon North.

On cash flow, Balnarring leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 2.96%, compared with 2.54% in Essendon North, a gap of 0.42 percentage points.

Over the past year house prices moved -3.6% in Balnarring (an estimate) and +13.7% in Essendon North, so recent momentum favours Essendon North, while Balnarring went backwards.

Rental vacancy is 1.4% in Essendon North and 1.7% in Balnarring, so landlords in Essendon North face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Essendon North is the bigger suburb, with a population of 3,071 against 2,371, larger than Balnarring; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Balnarring for rental income, Essendon North for recent price momentum, Essendon North for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison