Skip to main content

Balnarring vs Oakleigh

Property investment comparison - Balnarring, VIC 3926 vs Oakleigh, VIC 3166

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Balnarring wins 0, Oakleigh wins 4. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricBalnarringOakleigh
Median house price$1.4M$1.4M
Median unit price-$585K
Gross rental yield (houses)2.96%-
Gross rental yield (units)3.32%5.65%
1-year house growth-3.6%estimate-0.9%estimate
3-year house growth--
Vacancy rate1.7%1.4%
Population2,3718,442

Balnarring vs Oakleigh: what the numbers say

The median house price is $1.4M in Balnarring and $1.4M in Oakleigh, so Oakleigh is the cheaper entry point, with Balnarring houses about 1% dearer.

Over the past year house prices moved -3.6% in Balnarring (an estimate) and -0.9% in Oakleigh (an estimate), so recent momentum favours Oakleigh, while Balnarring went backwards.

Rental vacancy is 1.4% in Oakleigh and 1.7% in Balnarring, so landlords in Oakleigh face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Oakleigh is the bigger suburb, with a population of 8,442 against 2,371, roughly 3.6 times the size of Balnarring; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Oakleigh for a lower purchase price, Oakleigh for recent price momentum, Oakleigh for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison