Skip to main content

Balwyn vs Malvern

Property investment comparison - Balwyn, VIC 3103 vs Malvern, VIC 3144

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Balwyn wins 1, Malvern wins 4. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricBalwynMalvern
Median house price$2.7M$2.6M
Median unit price$860K$800K
Gross rental yield (houses)-2.36%
Gross rental yield (units)3.74%3.70%
1-year house growth-11.1%estimate-6.9%estimate
3-year house growth--
Vacancy rate1.7%1.4%
Population13,4959,929

Balwyn vs Malvern: what the numbers say

The median house price is $2.7M in Balwyn and $2.6M in Malvern, so Malvern is the cheaper entry point, with Balwyn houses about 4% dearer.

For units, Balwyn sits at a median of $860K against $800K in Malvern, which makes Malvern the more affordable unit market and Balwyn the pricier one.

Over the past year house prices moved -11.1% in Balwyn (an estimate) and -6.9% in Malvern (an estimate), so recent momentum favours Malvern, while Balwyn went backwards.

Rental vacancy is 1.4% in Malvern and 1.7% in Balwyn, so landlords in Malvern face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Balwyn is the bigger suburb, with a population of 13,495 against 9,929, larger than Malvern; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Malvern for a lower purchase price, Malvern for recent price momentum, Malvern for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison