Skip to main content

Banksia Grove vs Golden Bay

Property investment comparison - Banksia Grove, WA 6031 vs Golden Bay, WA 6174

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Banksia Grove wins 4, Golden Bay wins 1. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricBanksia GroveGolden Bay
Median house price$825K$830K
Median unit price-$880K
Gross rental yield (houses)4.69%4.00%
Gross rental yield (units)3.31%1.43%
1-year house growth+18.4%estimate+21.3%
3-year house growth-+78.3%
Vacancy rate1.4%1.8%
Population11,3515,681

Banksia Grove vs Golden Bay: what the numbers say

The median house price is $825K in Banksia Grove and $830K in Golden Bay, so Banksia Grove is the cheaper entry point, with Golden Bay houses about 1% dearer.

On cash flow, Banksia Grove leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 4.69%, compared with 4.00% in Golden Bay, a gap of 0.69 percentage points.

Over the past year house prices moved +18.4% in Banksia Grove (an estimate) and +21.3% in Golden Bay, so recent momentum favours Golden Bay, although both suburbs recorded growth.

Rental vacancy is 1.4% in Banksia Grove and 1.8% in Golden Bay, so landlords in Banksia Grove face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Banksia Grove is the bigger suburb, with a population of 11,351 against 5,681, larger than Golden Bay; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Banksia Grove for rental income, Banksia Grove for a lower purchase price, Golden Bay for recent price momentum, Banksia Grove for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison