Bannockburn vs Edge Hill
Property investment comparison - Bannockburn, QLD 4207 vs Edge Hill, QLD 4870
Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Bannockburn wins 2, Edge Hill wins 1. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.
| Metric | Bannockburn | Edge Hill |
|---|---|---|
| Median house price | $940K | $940K |
| Median unit price | - | $430K |
| Gross rental yield (houses) | 3.64% | - |
| Gross rental yield (units) | 3.51% | 6.36% |
| 1-year house growth | +21.1%estimate | +10.3% |
| 3-year house growth | - | +23.7% |
| Vacancy rate | 0.9% | 0.9% |
| Population | 960 | 4,088 |
Bannockburn vs Edge Hill: what the numbers say
Houses cost about the same in both suburbs: the median house price is $940K in Bannockburn and $940K in Edge Hill.
Over the past year house prices moved +21.1% in Bannockburn (an estimate) and +10.3% in Edge Hill, so recent momentum favours Bannockburn, although both suburbs recorded growth.
Rental vacancy is the same in both, at 0.9%.
Edge Hill is the bigger suburb, with a population of 4,088 against 960, roughly 4.3 times the size of Bannockburn; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.
In short: Bannockburn for recent price momentum. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.
Keep exploring
- National investment guide - top suburbs across every metric
- Take the suburb finder quiz - 5 questions to match your goals
- How our investment score works
- Property investment glossary - every term defined
Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs
Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.
Open interactive comparison