Skip to main content

Banyo vs Beerburrum

Property investment comparison - Banyo, QLD 4014 vs Beerburrum, QLD 4517

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Banyo wins 3, Beerburrum wins 1. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricBanyoBeerburrum
Median house price$1.2M$1.2M
Median unit price$850K$890K
Gross rental yield (houses)3.15%-
Gross rental yield (units)-4.92%
1-year house growth+11.7%+15.1%
3-year house growth+45.9%+44.8%
Vacancy rate0.4%1.9%
Population6,105941

Banyo vs Beerburrum: what the numbers say

Houses cost about the same in both suburbs: the median house price is $1.2M in Banyo and $1.2M in Beerburrum.

For units, Banyo sits at a median of $850K against $890K in Beerburrum, which makes Banyo the more affordable unit market and Beerburrum the pricier one.

Over the past year house prices moved +11.7% in Banyo and +15.1% in Beerburrum, so recent momentum favours Beerburrum, although both suburbs recorded growth.

Looking back three years, Banyo houses are +45.9% and Beerburrum houses +44.8%, so Banyo has compounded faster than Beerburrum over the longer window.

Rental vacancy is 0.4% in Banyo and 1.9% in Beerburrum, so landlords in Banyo face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Banyo is the bigger suburb, with a population of 6,105 against 941, roughly 6 times the size of Beerburrum; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Beerburrum for recent price momentum, Banyo for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison