Bardia vs Fletcher
Property investment comparison - Bardia, NSW 2565 vs Fletcher, NSW 2287
Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Bardia wins 2, Fletcher wins 3. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.
| Metric | Bardia | Fletcher |
|---|---|---|
| Median house price | $1.1M | $1.1M |
| Median unit price | $615K | $750K |
| Gross rental yield (houses) | 3.80% | - |
| Gross rental yield (units) | 4.89% | 5.11% |
| 1-year house growth | +9.0% | +12.2% |
| 3-year house growth | +18.8% | +20.6% |
| Vacancy rate | 2.2% | 2.2% |
| Population | 5,747 | 8,014 |
Bardia vs Fletcher: what the numbers say
Houses cost about the same in both suburbs: the median house price is $1.1M in Bardia and $1.1M in Fletcher.
For units, Bardia sits at a median of $615K against $750K in Fletcher, which makes Bardia the more affordable unit market and Fletcher the pricier one.
Over the past year house prices moved +9.0% in Bardia and +12.2% in Fletcher, so recent momentum favours Fletcher, although both suburbs recorded growth.
Looking back three years, Bardia houses are +18.8% and Fletcher houses +20.6%, so Fletcher has compounded faster than Bardia over the longer window.
Rental vacancy is the same in both, at 2.2%.
Fletcher is the bigger suburb, with a population of 8,014 against 5,747, larger than Bardia; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.
In short: Fletcher for recent price momentum. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.
Keep exploring
- National investment guide - top suburbs across every metric
- Take the suburb finder quiz - 5 questions to match your goals
- How our investment score works
- Property investment glossary - every term defined
Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs
Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.
Open interactive comparison