Skip to main content

Bargara vs Elliott Heads

Property investment comparison - Bargara, QLD 4670 vs Elliott Heads, QLD 4670

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Bargara wins 2, Elliott Heads wins 4. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricBargaraElliott Heads
Median house price$940K$935K
Median unit price$615K$480K
Gross rental yield (houses)3.95%-
Gross rental yield (units)5.15%5.13%
1-year house growth+11.1%+13.2%
3-year house growth+43.1%+55.1%
Vacancy rate2.1%2.4%
Population8,8831,160

Bargara vs Elliott Heads: what the numbers say

The median house price is $940K in Bargara and $935K in Elliott Heads, so Elliott Heads is the cheaper entry point, with Bargara houses about 1% dearer.

For units, Bargara sits at a median of $615K against $480K in Elliott Heads, which makes Elliott Heads the more affordable unit market and Bargara the pricier one.

Over the past year house prices moved +11.1% in Bargara and +13.2% in Elliott Heads, so recent momentum favours Elliott Heads, although both suburbs recorded growth.

Looking back three years, Bargara houses are +43.1% and Elliott Heads houses +55.1%, so Elliott Heads has compounded faster than Bargara over the longer window.

Rental vacancy is 2.1% in Bargara and 2.4% in Elliott Heads, so landlords in Bargara face less competition for tenants.

Bargara is the bigger suburb, with a population of 8,883 against 1,160, roughly 8 times the size of Elliott Heads; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Elliott Heads for a lower purchase price, Elliott Heads for recent price momentum, Bargara for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison