Skip to main content

Bargara vs Rangeville

Property investment comparison - Bargara, QLD 4670 vs Rangeville, QLD 4350

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Bargara wins 2, Rangeville wins 3. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricBargaraRangeville
Median house price$940K$940K
Median unit price$615K$665K
Gross rental yield (houses)3.95%-
Gross rental yield (units)5.15%4.18%
1-year house growth+11.1%+19.5%
3-year house growth+43.1%+50.6%
Vacancy rate2.1%1.3%
Population8,8838,668

Bargara vs Rangeville: what the numbers say

Houses cost about the same in both suburbs: the median house price is $940K in Bargara and $940K in Rangeville.

For units, Bargara sits at a median of $615K against $665K in Rangeville, which makes Bargara the more affordable unit market and Rangeville the pricier one.

Over the past year house prices moved +11.1% in Bargara and +19.5% in Rangeville, so recent momentum favours Rangeville, although both suburbs recorded growth.

Looking back three years, Bargara houses are +43.1% and Rangeville houses +50.6%, so Rangeville has compounded faster than Bargara over the longer window.

Rental vacancy is 1.3% in Rangeville and 2.1% in Bargara, so landlords in Rangeville face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Bargara is the bigger suburb, with a population of 8,883 against 8,668, larger than Rangeville; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Rangeville for recent price momentum, Rangeville for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison