Skip to main content

Bargara vs Regents Park

Property investment comparison - Bargara, QLD 4670 vs Regents Park, QLD 4118

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Bargara wins 3, Regents Park wins 2. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricBargaraRegents Park
Median house price$940K$945K
Median unit price$615K-
Gross rental yield (houses)3.95%-
Gross rental yield (units)5.15%4.27%
1-year house growth+11.1%+15.5%
3-year house growth+43.1%+45.7%
Vacancy rate2.1%2.4%
Population8,88311,103

Bargara vs Regents Park: what the numbers say

The median house price is $940K in Bargara and $945K in Regents Park, so Bargara is the cheaper entry point, with Regents Park houses about 1% dearer.

Over the past year house prices moved +11.1% in Bargara and +15.5% in Regents Park, so recent momentum favours Regents Park, although both suburbs recorded growth.

Looking back three years, Bargara houses are +43.1% and Regents Park houses +45.7%, so Regents Park has compounded faster than Bargara over the longer window.

Rental vacancy is 2.1% in Bargara and 2.4% in Regents Park, so landlords in Bargara face less competition for tenants.

Regents Park is the bigger suburb, with a population of 11,103 against 8,883, larger than Bargara; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Bargara for a lower purchase price, Regents Park for recent price momentum, Bargara for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison