Barragup vs Padbury
Property investment comparison - Barragup, WA 6209 vs Padbury, WA 6025
Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Barragup wins 1, Padbury wins 2. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.
| Metric | Barragup | Padbury |
|---|---|---|
| Median house price | $1.2M | $1.2M |
| Median unit price | $370K | - |
| Gross rental yield (houses) | - | 3.28% |
| Gross rental yield (units) | - | 4.80% |
| 1-year house growth | +9.0%estimate | +22.9% |
| 3-year house growth | - | +77.6% |
| Vacancy rate | 0.7% | 1.0% |
| Population | 940 | 8,626 |
Barragup vs Padbury: what the numbers say
The median house price is $1.2M in Barragup and $1.2M in Padbury, so Padbury is the cheaper entry point.
Over the past year house prices moved +9.0% in Barragup (an estimate) and +22.9% in Padbury, so recent momentum favours Padbury, although both suburbs recorded growth.
Rental vacancy is 0.7% in Barragup and 1.0% in Padbury, so landlords in Barragup face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.
Padbury is the bigger suburb, with a population of 8,626 against 940, roughly 9 times the size of Barragup; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.
In short: Padbury for a lower purchase price, Padbury for recent price momentum, Barragup for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.
Keep exploring
- National investment guide - top suburbs across every metric
- Take the suburb finder quiz - 5 questions to match your goals
- How our investment score works
- Property investment glossary - every term defined
Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs
Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.
Open interactive comparison