Skip to main content

Barringella vs Chain Valley Bay

Property investment comparison - Barringella, NSW 2540 vs Chain Valley Bay, NSW 2259

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Barringella wins 1, Chain Valley Bay wins 3. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricBarringellaChain Valley Bay
Median house price$825K$825K
Median unit price$625K$415K
Gross rental yield (houses)4.41%4.08%
Gross rental yield (units)4.33%7.35%
1-year house growth-+6.9%
3-year house growth--
Vacancy rate2.5%0.7%
Population302,773

Barringella vs Chain Valley Bay: what the numbers say

Houses cost about the same in both suburbs: the median house price is $825K in Barringella and $825K in Chain Valley Bay.

For units, Barringella sits at a median of $625K against $415K in Chain Valley Bay, which makes Chain Valley Bay the more affordable unit market and Barringella the pricier one.

On cash flow, Barringella leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 4.41%, compared with 4.08% in Chain Valley Bay, a gap of 0.33 percentage points.

Rental vacancy is 0.7% in Chain Valley Bay and 2.5% in Barringella, so landlords in Chain Valley Bay face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Chain Valley Bay is the bigger suburb, with a population of 2,773 against 30, roughly 92 times the size of Barringella; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Barringella for rental income, Chain Valley Bay for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison