Barringella vs Ellalong
Property investment comparison - Barringella, NSW 2540 vs Ellalong, NSW 2325
Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Barringella wins 1, Ellalong wins 3. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.
| Metric | Barringella | Ellalong |
|---|---|---|
| Median house price | $825K | $825K |
| Median unit price | $625K | $470K |
| Gross rental yield (houses) | 4.41% | 3.85% |
| Gross rental yield (units) | 4.33% | 5.79% |
| 1-year house growth | - | +10.2% |
| 3-year house growth | - | +15.6% |
| Vacancy rate | 2.5% | 2.1% |
| Population | 30 | 1,351 |
Barringella vs Ellalong: what the numbers say
Houses cost about the same in both suburbs: the median house price is $825K in Barringella and $825K in Ellalong.
For units, Barringella sits at a median of $625K against $470K in Ellalong, which makes Ellalong the more affordable unit market and Barringella the pricier one.
On cash flow, Barringella leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 4.41%, compared with 3.85% in Ellalong, a gap of 0.56 percentage points.
Rental vacancy is 2.1% in Ellalong and 2.5% in Barringella, so landlords in Ellalong face less competition for tenants.
Ellalong is the bigger suburb, with a population of 1,351 against 30, roughly 45 times the size of Barringella; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.
In short: Barringella for rental income, Ellalong for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.
Keep exploring
- National investment guide - top suburbs across every metric
- Take the suburb finder quiz - 5 questions to match your goals
- How our investment score works
- Property investment glossary - every term defined
Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs
Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.
Open interactive comparison