Barry vs Bowenfels
Property investment comparison - Barry, NSW 2340 vs Bowenfels, NSW 2790
Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Barry wins 3, Bowenfels wins 1. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.
| Metric | Barry | Bowenfels |
|---|---|---|
| Median house price | $535K | $540K |
| Median unit price | $365K | - |
| Gross rental yield (houses) | 5.52% | 4.30% |
| Gross rental yield (units) | 6.77% | 5.00% |
| 1-year house growth | - | +8.9% |
| 3-year house growth | - | +17.3% |
| Vacancy rate | 1.8% | 1.0% |
| Population | 153 | 2,049 |
Barry vs Bowenfels: what the numbers say
The median house price is $535K in Barry and $540K in Bowenfels, so Barry is the cheaper entry point, with Bowenfels houses about 1% dearer.
On cash flow, Barry leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 5.52%, compared with 4.30% in Bowenfels, a gap of 1.22 percentage points.
Rental vacancy is 1.0% in Bowenfels and 1.8% in Barry, so landlords in Bowenfels face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.
Bowenfels is the bigger suburb, with a population of 2,049 against 153, roughly 13 times the size of Barry; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.
In short: Barry for rental income, Barry for a lower purchase price, Bowenfels for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.
Keep exploring
- National investment guide - top suburbs across every metric
- Take the suburb finder quiz - 5 questions to match your goals
- How our investment score works
- Property investment glossary - every term defined
Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs
Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.
Open interactive comparison