Barry vs Greenhill
Property investment comparison - Barry, NSW 2340 vs Greenhill, NSW 2440
Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Barry wins 4, Greenhill wins 0. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.
| Metric | Barry | Greenhill |
|---|---|---|
| Median house price | $535K | $535K |
| Median unit price | $365K | $555K |
| Gross rental yield (houses) | 5.52% | 5.35% |
| Gross rental yield (units) | 6.77% | 3.57% |
| 1-year house growth | - | +1.3% |
| 3-year house growth | - | +8.0% |
| Vacancy rate | 1.8% | 2.3% |
| Population | 153 | 757 |
Barry vs Greenhill: what the numbers say
Houses cost about the same in both suburbs: the median house price is $535K in Barry and $535K in Greenhill.
For units, Barry sits at a median of $365K against $555K in Greenhill, which makes Barry the more affordable unit market and Greenhill the pricier one.
On cash flow, Barry leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 5.52%, compared with 5.35% in Greenhill, a gap of 0.17 percentage points.
Rental vacancy is 1.8% in Barry and 2.3% in Greenhill, so landlords in Barry face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.
Greenhill is the bigger suburb, with a population of 757 against 153, roughly 4.9 times the size of Barry; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.
In short: Barry for rental income, Barry for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.
Keep exploring
- National investment guide - top suburbs across every metric
- Take the suburb finder quiz - 5 questions to match your goals
- How our investment score works
- Property investment glossary - every term defined
Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs
Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.
Open interactive comparison