Skip to main content

Barwon Heads vs Blackburn North

Property investment comparison - Barwon Heads, VIC 3227 vs Blackburn North, VIC 3130

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Barwon Heads wins 2, Blackburn North wins 2. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricBarwon HeadsBlackburn North
Median house price$1.4M$1.4M
Median unit price$1.1M-
Gross rental yield (houses)-2.67%
Gross rental yield (units)3.18%-
1-year house growth-3.1%+5.7%
3-year house growth-23.8%+9.8%
Vacancy rate1.4%1.6%
Population4,3537,627

Barwon Heads vs Blackburn North: what the numbers say

The median house price is $1.4M in Barwon Heads and $1.4M in Blackburn North, so Barwon Heads is the cheaper entry point, with Blackburn North houses about 1% dearer.

Over the past year house prices moved -3.1% in Barwon Heads and +5.7% in Blackburn North, so recent momentum favours Blackburn North, while Barwon Heads went backwards.

Looking back three years, Barwon Heads houses are -23.8% and Blackburn North houses +9.8%, so Blackburn North has compounded faster than Barwon Heads over the longer window.

Rental vacancy is 1.4% in Barwon Heads and 1.6% in Blackburn North, so landlords in Barwon Heads face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Blackburn North is the bigger suburb, with a population of 7,627 against 4,353, larger than Barwon Heads; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Barwon Heads for a lower purchase price, Blackburn North for recent price momentum, Barwon Heads for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison