Skip to main content

Bass Hill vs Greenfield Park

Property investment comparison - Bass Hill, NSW 2197 vs Greenfield Park, NSW 2176

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Bass Hill wins 1, Greenfield Park wins 3. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricBass HillGreenfield Park
Median house price$1.5M$1.4M
Median unit price$970K-
Gross rental yield (houses)-2.52%
Gross rental yield (units)3.35%4.15%
1-year house growth+9.5%+10.4%estimate
3-year house growth+18.2%-
Vacancy rate1.2%2.3%
Population10,2305,394

Bass Hill vs Greenfield Park: what the numbers say

The median house price is $1.5M in Bass Hill and $1.4M in Greenfield Park, so Greenfield Park is the cheaper entry point, with Bass Hill houses about 1% dearer.

Over the past year house prices moved +9.5% in Bass Hill and +10.4% in Greenfield Park (an estimate), so recent momentum favours Greenfield Park, although both suburbs recorded growth.

Rental vacancy is 1.2% in Bass Hill and 2.3% in Greenfield Park, so landlords in Bass Hill face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Bass Hill is the bigger suburb, with a population of 10,230 against 5,394, larger than Greenfield Park; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Greenfield Park for a lower purchase price, Greenfield Park for recent price momentum, Bass Hill for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison