Skip to main content

Batehaven vs Wentworth Point

Property investment comparison - Batehaven, NSW 2536 vs Wentworth Point, NSW 2127

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Batehaven wins 2, Wentworth Point wins 2. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricBatehavenWentworth Point
Median house price$810K$815K
Median unit price$515K$760K
Gross rental yield (houses)3.87%5.39%
Gross rental yield (units)4.66%-
1-year house growth+1.3%-
3-year house growth+4.2%-
Vacancy rate2.1%1.8%
Population1,91112,703

Batehaven vs Wentworth Point: what the numbers say

The median house price is $810K in Batehaven and $815K in Wentworth Point, so Batehaven is the cheaper entry point, with Wentworth Point houses about 1% dearer.

For units, Batehaven sits at a median of $515K against $760K in Wentworth Point, which makes Batehaven the more affordable unit market and Wentworth Point the pricier one.

On cash flow, Wentworth Point leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 5.39%, compared with 3.87% in Batehaven, a gap of 1.52 percentage points.

Rental vacancy is 1.8% in Wentworth Point and 2.1% in Batehaven, so landlords in Wentworth Point face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Wentworth Point is the bigger suburb, with a population of 12,703 against 1,911, roughly 7 times the size of Batehaven; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Wentworth Point for rental income, Batehaven for a lower purchase price, Wentworth Point for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison