Baxter vs Officer
Property investment comparison - Baxter, VIC 3911 vs Officer, VIC 3809
Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Baxter wins 1, Officer wins 2. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.
| Metric | Baxter | Officer |
|---|---|---|
| Median house price | $755K | $755K |
| Median unit price | - | $570K |
| Gross rental yield (houses) | 4.05% | - |
| Gross rental yield (units) | 3.30% | 4.75% |
| 1-year house growth | +0.8% | +3.4%estimate |
| 3-year house growth | +11.2% | - |
| Vacancy rate | 1.1% | 1.2% |
| Population | 2,166 | 18,503 |
Baxter vs Officer: what the numbers say
Houses cost about the same in both suburbs: the median house price is $755K in Baxter and $755K in Officer.
Over the past year house prices moved +0.8% in Baxter and +3.4% in Officer (an estimate), so recent momentum favours Officer, although both suburbs recorded growth.
Rental vacancy is 1.1% in Baxter and 1.2% in Officer, so landlords in Baxter face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.
Officer is the bigger suburb, with a population of 18,503 against 2,166, roughly 9 times the size of Baxter; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.
In short: Officer for recent price momentum, Baxter for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.
Keep exploring
- National investment guide - top suburbs across every metric
- Take the suburb finder quiz - 5 questions to match your goals
- How our investment score works
- Property investment glossary - every term defined
Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs
Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.
Open interactive comparison