Skip to main content

Bayswater North vs Cashmore

Property investment comparison - Bayswater North, VIC 3153 vs Cashmore, VIC 3305

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Bayswater North wins 3, Cashmore wins 0. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricBayswater NorthCashmore
Median house price$925K$930K
Median unit price$665K-
Gross rental yield (houses)3.39%3.38%
Gross rental yield (units)4.32%-
1-year house growth+1.3%-
3-year house growth+9.7%-
Vacancy rate0.6%2.7%
Population9,014197

Bayswater North vs Cashmore: what the numbers say

The median house price is $925K in Bayswater North and $930K in Cashmore, so Bayswater North is the cheaper entry point, with Cashmore houses about 1% dearer.

Gross rental yield on houses is effectively level, at 3.39% in Bayswater North and 3.38% in Cashmore, so neither suburb has a cash flow edge on houses.

Rental vacancy is 0.6% in Bayswater North and 2.7% in Cashmore, so landlords in Bayswater North face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Bayswater North is the bigger suburb, with a population of 9,014 against 197, roughly 46 times the size of Cashmore; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Bayswater North for a lower purchase price, Bayswater North for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison