Skip to main content

Bayswater North vs Fyansford

Property investment comparison - Bayswater North, VIC 3153 vs Fyansford, VIC 3218

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Bayswater North wins 3, Fyansford wins 2. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricBayswater NorthFyansford
Median house price$925K$915K
Median unit price$665K$665K
Gross rental yield (houses)3.39%3.70%
Gross rental yield (units)4.32%4.19%
1-year house growth+1.3%-4.7%estimate
3-year house growth+9.7%-
Vacancy rate0.6%2.6%
Population9,0141,206

Bayswater North vs Fyansford: what the numbers say

The median house price is $925K in Bayswater North and $915K in Fyansford, so Fyansford is the cheaper entry point, with Bayswater North houses about 1% dearer.

On cash flow, Fyansford leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 3.70%, compared with 3.39% in Bayswater North, a gap of 0.31 percentage points.

Over the past year house prices moved +1.3% in Bayswater North and -4.7% in Fyansford (an estimate), so recent momentum favours Bayswater North, while Fyansford went backwards.

Rental vacancy is 0.6% in Bayswater North and 2.6% in Fyansford, so landlords in Bayswater North face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Bayswater North is the bigger suburb, with a population of 9,014 against 1,206, roughly 7 times the size of Fyansford; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Fyansford for rental income, Fyansford for a lower purchase price, Bayswater North for recent price momentum, Bayswater North for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison