Skip to main content

Bayswater North vs Gundowring

Property investment comparison - Bayswater North, VIC 3153 vs Gundowring, VIC 3691

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Bayswater North wins 2, Gundowring wins 3. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricBayswater NorthGundowring
Median house price$925K$920K
Median unit price$665K$595K
Gross rental yield (houses)3.39%3.74%
Gross rental yield (units)4.32%3.29%
1-year house growth+1.3%-
3-year house growth+9.7%-
Vacancy rate0.6%6.0%
Population9,014208

Bayswater North vs Gundowring: what the numbers say

The median house price is $925K in Bayswater North and $920K in Gundowring, so Gundowring is the cheaper entry point, with Bayswater North houses about 1% dearer.

For units, Bayswater North sits at a median of $665K against $595K in Gundowring, which makes Gundowring the more affordable unit market and Bayswater North the pricier one.

On cash flow, Gundowring leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 3.74%, compared with 3.39% in Bayswater North, a gap of 0.35 percentage points.

Rental vacancy is 0.6% in Bayswater North and 6.0% in Gundowring, so landlords in Bayswater North face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Bayswater North is the bigger suburb, with a population of 9,014 against 208, roughly 43 times the size of Gundowring; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Gundowring for rental income, Gundowring for a lower purchase price, Bayswater North for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison