Skip to main content

Bayswater North vs Koriella

Property investment comparison - Bayswater North, VIC 3153 vs Koriella, VIC 3714

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Bayswater North wins 3, Koriella wins 2. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricBayswater NorthKoriella
Median house price$925K$920K
Median unit price$665K$575K
Gross rental yield (houses)3.39%2.04%
Gross rental yield (units)4.32%2.66%
1-year house growth+1.3%-
3-year house growth+9.7%-
Vacancy rate0.6%1.0%
Population9,01466

Bayswater North vs Koriella: what the numbers say

The median house price is $925K in Bayswater North and $920K in Koriella, so Koriella is the cheaper entry point, with Bayswater North houses about 1% dearer.

For units, Bayswater North sits at a median of $665K against $575K in Koriella, which makes Koriella the more affordable unit market and Bayswater North the pricier one.

On cash flow, Bayswater North leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 3.39%, compared with 2.04% in Koriella, a gap of 1.35 percentage points.

Rental vacancy is 0.6% in Bayswater North and 1.0% in Koriella, so landlords in Bayswater North face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Bayswater North is the bigger suburb, with a population of 9,014 against 66, roughly 137 times the size of Koriella; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Bayswater North for rental income, Koriella for a lower purchase price, Bayswater North for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison