Skip to main content

Bayswater North vs Maffra West Upper

Property investment comparison - Bayswater North, VIC 3153 vs Maffra West Upper, VIC 3859

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Bayswater North wins 3, Maffra West Upper wins 1. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricBayswater NorthMaffra West Upper
Median house price$925K$930K
Median unit price$665K$515K
Gross rental yield (houses)3.39%-
Gross rental yield (units)4.32%2.38%
1-year house growth+1.3%-
3-year house growth+9.7%-
Vacancy rate0.6%2.1%
Population9,01473

Bayswater North vs Maffra West Upper: what the numbers say

The median house price is $925K in Bayswater North and $930K in Maffra West Upper, so Bayswater North is the cheaper entry point, with Maffra West Upper houses about 1% dearer.

For units, Bayswater North sits at a median of $665K against $515K in Maffra West Upper, which makes Maffra West Upper the more affordable unit market and Bayswater North the pricier one.

Rental vacancy is 0.6% in Bayswater North and 2.1% in Maffra West Upper, so landlords in Bayswater North face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Bayswater North is the bigger suburb, with a population of 9,014 against 73, roughly 123 times the size of Maffra West Upper; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Bayswater North for a lower purchase price, Bayswater North for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison