Skip to main content

Bayswater North vs Seaford

Property investment comparison - Bayswater North, VIC 3153 vs Seaford, VIC 3198

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Bayswater North wins 3, Seaford wins 2. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricBayswater NorthSeaford
Median house price$925K$920K
Median unit price$665K$700K
Gross rental yield (houses)3.39%-
Gross rental yield (units)4.32%3.96%
1-year house growth+1.3%+6.5%estimate
3-year house growth+9.7%-
Vacancy rate0.6%1.3%
Population9,01417,215

Bayswater North vs Seaford: what the numbers say

The median house price is $925K in Bayswater North and $920K in Seaford, so Seaford is the cheaper entry point, with Bayswater North houses about 1% dearer.

For units, Bayswater North sits at a median of $665K against $700K in Seaford, which makes Bayswater North the more affordable unit market and Seaford the pricier one.

Over the past year house prices moved +1.3% in Bayswater North and +6.5% in Seaford (an estimate), so recent momentum favours Seaford, although both suburbs recorded growth.

Rental vacancy is 0.6% in Bayswater North and 1.3% in Seaford, so landlords in Bayswater North face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Seaford is the bigger suburb, with a population of 17,215 against 9,014, larger than Bayswater North; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Seaford for a lower purchase price, Seaford for recent price momentum, Bayswater North for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison