Skip to main content

Beach Holm vs Julatten

Property investment comparison - Beach Holm, QLD 4818 vs Julatten, QLD 4871

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Beach Holm wins 1, Julatten wins 2. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricBeach HolmJulatten
Median house price$850K$850K
Median unit price$510K$1.3M
Gross rental yield (houses)3.28%3.73%
Gross rental yield (units)5.14%-
1-year house growth-+9.2%
3-year house growth-+39.3%
Vacancy rate3.4%1.5%
Population351,020

Beach Holm vs Julatten: what the numbers say

Houses cost about the same in both suburbs: the median house price is $850K in Beach Holm and $850K in Julatten.

For units, Beach Holm sits at a median of $510K against $1.3M in Julatten, which makes Beach Holm the more affordable unit market and Julatten the pricier one.

On cash flow, Julatten leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 3.73%, compared with 3.28% in Beach Holm, a gap of 0.45 percentage points.

Rental vacancy is 1.5% in Julatten and 3.4% in Beach Holm, so landlords in Julatten face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Julatten is the bigger suburb, with a population of 1,020 against 35, roughly 29 times the size of Beach Holm; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Julatten for rental income, Julatten for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison