Skip to main content

Beaconsfield vs Denistone West

Property investment comparison - Beaconsfield, NSW 2015 vs Denistone West, NSW 2114

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Beaconsfield wins 2, Denistone West wins 3. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricBeaconsfieldDenistone West
Median house price$2.3M$2.3M
Median unit price$1.4M$730K
Gross rental yield (houses)2.83%-
Gross rental yield (units)3.43%5.03%
1-year house growth+3.5%+3.5%
3-year house growth+13.4%+0.7%
Vacancy rate2.6%9.0%
Population1,172947

Beaconsfield vs Denistone West: what the numbers say

The median house price is $2.3M in Beaconsfield and $2.3M in Denistone West, so Denistone West is the cheaper entry point, with Beaconsfield houses about 1% dearer.

For units, Beaconsfield sits at a median of $1.4M against $730K in Denistone West, which makes Denistone West the more affordable unit market and Beaconsfield the pricier one.

Over the past year house prices moved +3.5% in both suburbs.

Looking back three years, Beaconsfield houses are +13.4% and Denistone West houses +0.7%, so Beaconsfield has compounded faster than Denistone West over the longer window.

Rental vacancy is 2.6% in Beaconsfield and 9.0% in Denistone West, so landlords in Beaconsfield face less competition for tenants.

Beaconsfield is the bigger suburb, with a population of 1,172 against 947, larger than Denistone West; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Denistone West for a lower purchase price, Beaconsfield for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison
Beaconsfield vs Denistone West: Suburb Comparison 2026