Skip to main content

Beaconsfield vs Mooball

Property investment comparison - Beaconsfield, NSW 2015 vs Mooball, NSW 2483

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Beaconsfield wins 1, Mooball wins 4. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricBeaconsfieldMooball
Median house price$2.3M$2.3M
Median unit price$1.4M$880K
Gross rental yield (houses)2.83%2.36%
Gross rental yield (units)3.43%4.21%
1-year house growth+3.5%-
3-year house growth+13.4%-
Vacancy rate2.6%0.6%
Population1,172193

Beaconsfield vs Mooball: what the numbers say

The median house price is $2.3M in Beaconsfield and $2.3M in Mooball, so Mooball is the cheaper entry point.

For units, Beaconsfield sits at a median of $1.4M against $880K in Mooball, which makes Mooball the more affordable unit market and Beaconsfield the pricier one.

On cash flow, Beaconsfield leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 2.83%, compared with 2.36% in Mooball, a gap of 0.47 percentage points.

Rental vacancy is 0.6% in Mooball and 2.6% in Beaconsfield, so landlords in Mooball face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Beaconsfield is the bigger suburb, with a population of 1,172 against 193, roughly 6 times the size of Mooball; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Beaconsfield for rental income, Mooball for a lower purchase price, Mooball for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison