Beaconsfield vs Thinoomba
Property investment comparison - Beaconsfield, QLD 4740 vs Thinoomba, QLD 4650
Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Beaconsfield wins 2, Thinoomba wins 0. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.
| Metric | Beaconsfield | Thinoomba |
|---|---|---|
| Median house price | $730K | $730K |
| Median unit price | - | - |
| Gross rental yield (houses) | 5.19% | 4.01% |
| Gross rental yield (units) | - | - |
| 1-year house growth | +12.3% | - |
| 3-year house growth | +63.1% | - |
| Vacancy rate | 0.8% | 12.5% |
| Population | 5,899 | 16 |
Beaconsfield vs Thinoomba: what the numbers say
Houses cost about the same in both suburbs: the median house price is $730K in Beaconsfield and $730K in Thinoomba.
On cash flow, Beaconsfield leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 5.19%, compared with 4.01% in Thinoomba, a gap of 1.18 percentage points.
Rental vacancy is 0.8% in Beaconsfield and 12.5% in Thinoomba, so landlords in Beaconsfield face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.
Beaconsfield is the bigger suburb, with a population of 5,899 against 16, roughly 369 times the size of Thinoomba; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.
In short: Beaconsfield for rental income, Beaconsfield for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.
Keep exploring
- National investment guide - top suburbs across every metric
- Take the suburb finder quiz - 5 questions to match your goals
- How our investment score works
- Property investment glossary - every term defined
Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs
Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.
Open interactive comparison