Skip to main content

Beaconsfield vs Scottsdale

Property investment comparison - Beaconsfield, TAS 7270 vs Scottsdale, TAS 7260

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Beaconsfield wins 4, Scottsdale wins 0. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricBeaconsfieldScottsdale
Median house price$475K$475K
Median unit price--
Gross rental yield (houses)5.04%5.00%
Gross rental yield (units)5.83%4.07%
1-year house growth+14.1%estimate+8.3%
3-year house growth-+20.1%
Vacancy rate0.9%1.2%
Population1,3622,408

Beaconsfield vs Scottsdale: what the numbers say

Houses cost about the same in both suburbs: the median house price is $475K in Beaconsfield and $475K in Scottsdale.

Gross rental yield on houses is effectively level, at 5.04% in Beaconsfield and 5.00% in Scottsdale, so neither suburb has a cash flow edge on houses.

Over the past year house prices moved +14.1% in Beaconsfield (an estimate) and +8.3% in Scottsdale, so recent momentum favours Beaconsfield, although both suburbs recorded growth.

Rental vacancy is 0.9% in Beaconsfield and 1.2% in Scottsdale, so landlords in Beaconsfield face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Scottsdale is the bigger suburb, with a population of 2,408 against 1,362, larger than Beaconsfield; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Beaconsfield for recent price momentum, Beaconsfield for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison
Beaconsfield vs Scottsdale: Suburb Comparison 2026