Bearii vs Charlton
Property investment comparison - Bearii, VIC 3641 vs Charlton, VIC 3525
Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Bearii wins 1, Charlton wins 1. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.
| Metric | Bearii | Charlton |
|---|---|---|
| Median house price | $335K | $330K |
| Median unit price | - | $330K |
| Gross rental yield (houses) | - | 6.95% |
| Gross rental yield (units) | - | 2.49% |
| 1-year house growth | - | +8.2% |
| 3-year house growth | - | +0.0% |
| Vacancy rate | 1.4% | 1.7% |
| Population | 167 | 1,095 |
Bearii vs Charlton: what the numbers say
The median house price is $335K in Bearii and $330K in Charlton, so Charlton is the cheaper entry point, with Bearii houses about 2% dearer.
Rental vacancy is 1.4% in Bearii and 1.7% in Charlton, so landlords in Bearii face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.
Charlton is the bigger suburb, with a population of 1,095 against 167, roughly 7 times the size of Bearii; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.
In short: Charlton for a lower purchase price, Bearii for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.
Keep exploring
- National investment guide - top suburbs across every metric
- Take the suburb finder quiz - 5 questions to match your goals
- How our investment score works
- Property investment glossary - every term defined
Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs
Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.
Open interactive comparison