Beaufort vs Bindi
Property investment comparison - Beaufort, VIC 3373 vs Bindi, VIC 3896
Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Beaufort wins 2, Bindi wins 1. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.
| Metric | Beaufort | Bindi |
|---|---|---|
| Median house price | $455K | $450K |
| Median unit price | $425K | - |
| Gross rental yield (houses) | 4.78% | 4.68% |
| Gross rental yield (units) | - | - |
| 1-year house growth | +13.5% | - |
| 3-year house growth | +7.4% | - |
| Vacancy rate | 0.5% | 2.1% |
| Population | 1,712 | 49 |
Beaufort vs Bindi: what the numbers say
The median house price is $455K in Beaufort and $450K in Bindi, so Bindi is the cheaper entry point, with Beaufort houses about 1% dearer.
On cash flow, Beaufort leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 4.78%, compared with 4.68% in Bindi, a gap of 0.10 percentage points.
Rental vacancy is 0.5% in Beaufort and 2.1% in Bindi, so landlords in Beaufort face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.
Beaufort is the bigger suburb, with a population of 1,712 against 49, roughly 35 times the size of Bindi; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.
In short: Beaufort for rental income, Bindi for a lower purchase price, Beaufort for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.
Keep exploring
- National investment guide - top suburbs across every metric
- Take the suburb finder quiz - 5 questions to match your goals
- How our investment score works
- Property investment glossary - every term defined
Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs
Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.
Open interactive comparison