Skip to main content

Beaumont Hills vs Rydalmere

Property investment comparison - Beaumont Hills, NSW 2155 vs Rydalmere, NSW 2116

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Beaumont Hills wins 3, Rydalmere wins 1. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricBeaumont HillsRydalmere
Median house price$1.9M$1.9M
Median unit price$670K$725K
Gross rental yield (houses)2.64%-
Gross rental yield (units)5.28%4.93%
1-year house growth+7.0%+3.8%estimate
3-year house growth-0.3%-
Vacancy rate2.0%1.0%
Population9,0417,274

Beaumont Hills vs Rydalmere: what the numbers say

Houses cost about the same in both suburbs: the median house price is $1.9M in Beaumont Hills and $1.9M in Rydalmere.

For units, Beaumont Hills sits at a median of $670K against $725K in Rydalmere, which makes Beaumont Hills the more affordable unit market and Rydalmere the pricier one.

Over the past year house prices moved +7.0% in Beaumont Hills and +3.8% in Rydalmere (an estimate), so recent momentum favours Beaumont Hills, although both suburbs recorded growth.

Rental vacancy is 1.0% in Rydalmere and 2.0% in Beaumont Hills, so landlords in Rydalmere face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Beaumont Hills is the bigger suburb, with a population of 9,041 against 7,274, larger than Rydalmere; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Beaumont Hills for recent price momentum, Rydalmere for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison