Skip to main content

Beauty Point vs Dover

Property investment comparison - Beauty Point, TAS 7270 vs Dover, TAS 7117

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Beauty Point wins 2, Dover wins 3. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricBeauty PointDover
Median house price$560K$565K
Median unit price-$335K
Gross rental yield (houses)3.99%4.26%
Gross rental yield (units)4.00%5.78%
1-year house growth+11.7%+6.6%estimate
3-year house growth+28.7%-
Vacancy rate3.0%2.9%
Population1,285923

Beauty Point vs Dover: what the numbers say

The median house price is $560K in Beauty Point and $565K in Dover, so Beauty Point is the cheaper entry point, with Dover houses about 1% dearer.

On cash flow, Dover leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 4.26%, compared with 3.99% in Beauty Point, a gap of 0.27 percentage points.

Over the past year house prices moved +11.7% in Beauty Point and +6.6% in Dover (an estimate), so recent momentum favours Beauty Point, although both suburbs recorded growth.

Rental vacancy is 2.9% in Dover and 3.0% in Beauty Point, so landlords in Dover face less competition for tenants.

Beauty Point is the bigger suburb, with a population of 1,285 against 923, larger than Dover; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Dover for rental income, Beauty Point for a lower purchase price, Beauty Point for recent price momentum, Dover for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison