Skip to main content

Beckenham vs Beechboro

Property investment comparison - Beckenham, WA 6107 vs Beechboro, WA 6063

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Beckenham wins 3, Beechboro wins 3. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricBeckenhamBeechboro
Median house price$870K$875K
Median unit price--
Gross rental yield (houses)4.55%4.33%
Gross rental yield (units)5.24%5.30%
1-year house growth+20.8%+20.7%
3-year house growth+70.8%+81.6%
Vacancy rate0.9%0.9%
Population9,0929,112

Beckenham vs Beechboro: what the numbers say

The median house price is $870K in Beckenham and $875K in Beechboro, so Beckenham is the cheaper entry point, with Beechboro houses about 1% dearer.

On cash flow, Beckenham leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 4.55%, compared with 4.33% in Beechboro, a gap of 0.22 percentage points.

Over the past year house prices moved +20.8% in Beckenham and +20.7% in Beechboro, so recent momentum favours Beckenham, although both suburbs recorded growth.

Looking back three years, Beckenham houses are +70.8% and Beechboro houses +81.6%, so Beechboro has compounded faster than Beckenham over the longer window.

Rental vacancy is the same in both, at 0.9%.

Beechboro is the bigger suburb, with a population of 9,112 against 9,092, larger than Beckenham; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Beckenham for rental income, Beckenham for a lower purchase price, Beckenham for recent price momentum. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison