Skip to main content

Beckenham vs Milpara

Property investment comparison - Beckenham, WA 6107 vs Milpara, WA 6330

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Beckenham wins 3, Milpara wins 3. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricBeckenhamMilpara
Median house price$870K$875K
Median unit price-$475K
Gross rental yield (houses)4.55%4.56%
Gross rental yield (units)5.24%6.57%
1-year house growth+20.8%+20.2%
3-year house growth+70.8%+75.5%
Vacancy rate0.9%2.2%
Population9,092953

Beckenham vs Milpara: what the numbers say

The median house price is $870K in Beckenham and $875K in Milpara, so Beckenham is the cheaper entry point, with Milpara houses about 1% dearer.

Gross rental yield on houses is effectively level, at 4.55% in Beckenham and 4.56% in Milpara, so neither suburb has a cash flow edge on houses.

Over the past year house prices moved +20.8% in Beckenham and +20.2% in Milpara, so recent momentum favours Beckenham, although both suburbs recorded growth.

Looking back three years, Beckenham houses are +70.8% and Milpara houses +75.5%, so Milpara has compounded faster than Beckenham over the longer window.

Rental vacancy is 0.9% in Beckenham and 2.2% in Milpara, so landlords in Beckenham face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Beckenham is the bigger suburb, with a population of 9,092 against 953, roughly 10 times the size of Milpara; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Beckenham for a lower purchase price, Beckenham for recent price momentum, Beckenham for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison