Skip to main content

Bedgerebong vs Deniliquin

Property investment comparison - Bedgerebong, NSW 2871 vs Deniliquin, NSW 2710

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Bedgerebong wins 0, Deniliquin wins 5. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricBedgerebongDeniliquin
Median house price$420K$415K
Median unit price$405K-
Gross rental yield (houses)5.31%5.58%
Gross rental yield (units)3.43%5.62%
1-year house growth+10.6%+11.2%
3-year house growth-+32.2%
Vacancy rate1.6%0.3%
Population8,9657,432

Bedgerebong vs Deniliquin: what the numbers say

The median house price is $420K in Bedgerebong and $415K in Deniliquin, so Deniliquin is the cheaper entry point, with Bedgerebong houses about 1% dearer.

On cash flow, Deniliquin leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 5.58%, compared with 5.31% in Bedgerebong, a gap of 0.27 percentage points.

Over the past year house prices moved +10.6% in Bedgerebong and +11.2% in Deniliquin, so recent momentum favours Deniliquin, although both suburbs recorded growth.

Rental vacancy is 0.3% in Deniliquin and 1.6% in Bedgerebong, so landlords in Deniliquin face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Bedgerebong is the bigger suburb, with a population of 8,965 against 7,432, larger than Deniliquin; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Deniliquin for rental income, Deniliquin for a lower purchase price, Deniliquin for recent price momentum, Deniliquin for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison