Skip to main content

Bedgerebong vs Tumbarumba

Property investment comparison - Bedgerebong, NSW 2871 vs Tumbarumba, NSW 2653

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Bedgerebong wins 1, Tumbarumba wins 4. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricBedgerebongTumbarumba
Median house price$420K$425K
Median unit price$405K-
Gross rental yield (houses)5.31%5.87%
Gross rental yield (units)3.43%3.84%
1-year house growth+10.6%+11.4%
3-year house growth-+10.8%
Vacancy rate1.6%0.8%
Population8,9651,915

Bedgerebong vs Tumbarumba: what the numbers say

The median house price is $420K in Bedgerebong and $425K in Tumbarumba, so Bedgerebong is the cheaper entry point, with Tumbarumba houses about 1% dearer.

On cash flow, Tumbarumba leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 5.87%, compared with 5.31% in Bedgerebong, a gap of 0.56 percentage points.

Over the past year house prices moved +10.6% in Bedgerebong and +11.4% in Tumbarumba, so recent momentum favours Tumbarumba, although both suburbs recorded growth.

Rental vacancy is 0.8% in Tumbarumba and 1.6% in Bedgerebong, so landlords in Tumbarumba face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Bedgerebong is the bigger suburb, with a population of 8,965 against 1,915, roughly 4.7 times the size of Tumbarumba; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Tumbarumba for rental income, Bedgerebong for a lower purchase price, Tumbarumba for recent price momentum, Tumbarumba for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison