Skip to main content

Beecroft vs Elanora Heights

Property investment comparison - Beecroft, NSW 2119 vs Elanora Heights, NSW 2101

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Beecroft wins 2, Elanora Heights wins 1. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricBeecroftElanora Heights
Median house price$2.6M$2.6M
Median unit price$1.0M-
Gross rental yield (houses)-2.89%
Gross rental yield (units)--
1-year house growth-3.8%+1.5%estimate
3-year house growth+1.1%-
Vacancy rate1.9%3.0%
Population10,2914,581

Beecroft vs Elanora Heights: what the numbers say

The median house price is $2.6M in Beecroft and $2.6M in Elanora Heights, so Beecroft is the cheaper entry point.

Over the past year house prices moved -3.8% in Beecroft and +1.5% in Elanora Heights (an estimate), so recent momentum favours Elanora Heights, while Beecroft went backwards.

Rental vacancy is 1.9% in Beecroft and 3.0% in Elanora Heights, so landlords in Beecroft face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Beecroft is the bigger suburb, with a population of 10,291 against 4,581, roughly 2.2 times the size of Elanora Heights; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Beecroft for a lower purchase price, Elanora Heights for recent price momentum, Beecroft for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison