Skip to main content

Beeliar vs Walliston

Property investment comparison - Beeliar, WA 6164 vs Walliston, WA 6076

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Beeliar wins 2, Walliston wins 2. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricBeeliarWalliston
Median house price$1.1M$1.1M
Median unit price$655K$660K
Gross rental yield (houses)4.00%5.44%
Gross rental yield (units)4.95%5.51%
1-year house growth-+18.1%estimate
3-year house growth--
Vacancy rate0.6%1.0%
Population8,6171,016

Beeliar vs Walliston: what the numbers say

Houses cost about the same in both suburbs: the median house price is $1.1M in Beeliar and $1.1M in Walliston.

For units, Beeliar sits at a median of $655K against $660K in Walliston, which makes Beeliar the more affordable unit market and Walliston the pricier one.

On cash flow, Walliston leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 5.44%, compared with 4.00% in Beeliar, a gap of 1.44 percentage points.

Rental vacancy is 0.6% in Beeliar and 1.0% in Walliston, so landlords in Beeliar face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Beeliar is the bigger suburb, with a population of 8,617 against 1,016, roughly 8 times the size of Walliston; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Walliston for rental income, Beeliar for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison