Skip to main content

Beeliar vs Woodbridge

Property investment comparison - Beeliar, WA 6164 vs Woodbridge, WA 6056

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Beeliar wins 2, Woodbridge wins 2. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricBeeliarWoodbridge
Median house price$1.1M$1.1M
Median unit price$655K$610K
Gross rental yield (houses)4.00%3.90%
Gross rental yield (units)4.95%-
1-year house growth-+12.7%estimate
3-year house growth--
Vacancy rate0.6%1.3%
Population8,6171,207

Beeliar vs Woodbridge: what the numbers say

The median house price is $1.1M in Beeliar and $1.1M in Woodbridge, so Woodbridge is the cheaper entry point, with Beeliar houses about 2% dearer.

For units, Beeliar sits at a median of $655K against $610K in Woodbridge, which makes Woodbridge the more affordable unit market and Beeliar the pricier one.

On cash flow, Beeliar leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 4.00%, compared with 3.90% in Woodbridge, a gap of 0.10 percentage points.

Rental vacancy is 0.6% in Beeliar and 1.3% in Woodbridge, so landlords in Beeliar face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Beeliar is the bigger suburb, with a population of 8,617 against 1,207, roughly 7 times the size of Woodbridge; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Beeliar for rental income, Woodbridge for a lower purchase price, Beeliar for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison