Skip to main content

Beerburrum vs Rifle Range

Property investment comparison - Beerburrum, QLD 4517 vs Rifle Range, QLD 4311

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Beerburrum wins 1, Rifle Range wins 3. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricBeerburrumRifle Range
Median house price$1.2M$1.2M
Median unit price$890K-
Gross rental yield (houses)-2.73%
Gross rental yield (units)4.92%-
1-year house growth+15.1%+16.0%
3-year house growth+44.8%+61.6%
Vacancy rate1.9%8.5%
Population941197

Beerburrum vs Rifle Range: what the numbers say

The median house price is $1.2M in Beerburrum and $1.2M in Rifle Range, so Rifle Range is the cheaper entry point.

Over the past year house prices moved +15.1% in Beerburrum and +16.0% in Rifle Range, so recent momentum favours Rifle Range, although both suburbs recorded growth.

Looking back three years, Beerburrum houses are +44.8% and Rifle Range houses +61.6%, so Rifle Range has compounded faster than Beerburrum over the longer window.

Rental vacancy is 1.9% in Beerburrum and 8.5% in Rifle Range, so landlords in Beerburrum face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Beerburrum is the bigger suburb, with a population of 941 against 197, roughly 4.8 times the size of Rifle Range; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Rifle Range for a lower purchase price, Rifle Range for recent price momentum, Beerburrum for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison