Skip to main content

Beerwah vs Deagon

Property investment comparison - Beerwah, QLD 4519 vs Deagon, QLD 4017

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Beerwah wins 3, Deagon wins 2. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricBeerwahDeagon
Median house price$1.1M$1.1M
Median unit price$705K$340K
Gross rental yield (houses)3.59%3.24%
Gross rental yield (units)-6.04%
1-year house growth+16.5%-
3-year house growth+40.1%+45.7%
Vacancy rate0.5%0.8%
Population7,7343,773

Beerwah vs Deagon: what the numbers say

The median house price is $1.1M in Beerwah and $1.1M in Deagon, so Beerwah is the cheaper entry point.

For units, Beerwah sits at a median of $705K against $340K in Deagon, which makes Deagon the more affordable unit market and Beerwah the pricier one.

On cash flow, Beerwah leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 3.59%, compared with 3.24% in Deagon, a gap of 0.35 percentage points.

Looking back three years, Beerwah houses are +40.1% and Deagon houses +45.7%, so Deagon has compounded faster than Beerwah over the longer window.

Rental vacancy is 0.5% in Beerwah and 0.8% in Deagon, so landlords in Beerwah face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Beerwah is the bigger suburb, with a population of 7,734 against 3,773, roughly 2.0 times the size of Deagon; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Beerwah for rental income, Beerwah for a lower purchase price, Beerwah for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison