Skip to main content

Beerwah vs Lamb Range

Property investment comparison - Beerwah, QLD 4519 vs Lamb Range, QLD 4870

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Beerwah wins 1, Lamb Range wins 3. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricBeerwahLamb Range
Median house price$1.1M$1.1M
Median unit price$705K$420K
Gross rental yield (houses)3.59%3.74%
Gross rental yield (units)-5.80%
1-year house growth+16.5%-
3-year house growth+40.1%-
Vacancy rate0.5%0.6%
Population7,7347

Beerwah vs Lamb Range: what the numbers say

The median house price is $1.1M in Beerwah and $1.1M in Lamb Range, so Lamb Range is the cheaper entry point, with Beerwah houses about 1% dearer.

For units, Beerwah sits at a median of $705K against $420K in Lamb Range, which makes Lamb Range the more affordable unit market and Beerwah the pricier one.

On cash flow, Lamb Range leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 3.74%, compared with 3.59% in Beerwah, a gap of 0.15 percentage points.

Rental vacancy is 0.5% in Beerwah and 0.6% in Lamb Range, so landlords in Beerwah face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Beerwah is the bigger suburb, with a population of 7,734 against 7, roughly 1105 times the size of Lamb Range; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Lamb Range for rental income, Lamb Range for a lower purchase price, Beerwah for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison