Skip to main content

Belgrave vs San Remo

Property investment comparison - Belgrave, VIC 3160 vs San Remo, VIC 3925

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Belgrave wins 2, San Remo wins 2. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricBelgraveSan Remo
Median house price$855K$850K
Median unit price-$435K
Gross rental yield (houses)4.01%-
Gross rental yield (units)1.83%-
1-year house growth+4.8%-5.8%
3-year house growth+3.3%-14.3%
Vacancy rate1.6%0.8%
Population3,8941,700

Belgrave vs San Remo: what the numbers say

The median house price is $855K in Belgrave and $850K in San Remo, so San Remo is the cheaper entry point, with Belgrave houses about 1% dearer.

Over the past year house prices moved +4.8% in Belgrave and -5.8% in San Remo, so recent momentum favours Belgrave, while San Remo went backwards.

Looking back three years, Belgrave houses are +3.3% and San Remo houses -14.3%, so Belgrave has compounded faster than San Remo over the longer window.

Rental vacancy is 0.8% in San Remo and 1.6% in Belgrave, so landlords in San Remo face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Belgrave is the bigger suburb, with a population of 3,894 against 1,700, roughly 2.3 times the size of San Remo; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: San Remo for a lower purchase price, Belgrave for recent price momentum, San Remo for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison