Skip to main content

Bellevue Heights vs Camden Park

Property investment comparison - Bellevue Heights, SA 5050 vs Camden Park, SA 5038

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Bellevue Heights wins 1, Camden Park wins 3. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricBellevue HeightsCamden Park
Median house price$1.2M-
Median unit price-$625K
Gross rental yield (houses)3.00%-
Gross rental yield (units)2.50%4.60%
1-year house growth+15.9%+9.8%
3-year house growth+35.0%+42.1%
Vacancy rate1.6%0.9%
Population2,7123,338

Bellevue Heights vs Camden Park: what the numbers say

Over the past year house prices moved +15.9% in Bellevue Heights and +9.8% in Camden Park, so recent momentum favours Bellevue Heights, although both suburbs recorded growth.

Looking back three years, Bellevue Heights houses are +35.0% and Camden Park houses +42.1%, so Camden Park has compounded faster than Bellevue Heights over the longer window.

Rental vacancy is 0.9% in Camden Park and 1.6% in Bellevue Heights, so landlords in Camden Park face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Camden Park is the bigger suburb, with a population of 3,338 against 2,712, larger than Bellevue Heights; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Bellevue Heights for recent price momentum, Camden Park for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison