Skip to main content

Bellevue Heights vs Dernancourt

Property investment comparison - Bellevue Heights, SA 5050 vs Dernancourt, SA 5075

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Bellevue Heights wins 0, Dernancourt wins 4. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricBellevue HeightsDernancourt
Median house price$1.2M-
Median unit price--
Gross rental yield (houses)3.00%-
Gross rental yield (units)2.50%4.25%
1-year house growth+15.9%+16.1%
3-year house growth+35.0%+44.2%
Vacancy rate1.6%1.3%
Population2,7124,063

Bellevue Heights vs Dernancourt: what the numbers say

Over the past year house prices moved +15.9% in Bellevue Heights and +16.1% in Dernancourt, so recent momentum favours Dernancourt, although both suburbs recorded growth.

Looking back three years, Bellevue Heights houses are +35.0% and Dernancourt houses +44.2%, so Dernancourt has compounded faster than Bellevue Heights over the longer window.

Rental vacancy is 1.3% in Dernancourt and 1.6% in Bellevue Heights, so landlords in Dernancourt face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Dernancourt is the bigger suburb, with a population of 4,063 against 2,712, larger than Bellevue Heights; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Dernancourt for recent price momentum, Dernancourt for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison